Sunday 25 July 2010
Wednesday 2 September 2009
@fingr - http://fingr.info - my latest invention
Hello. me again. Just a quick note to tell you about my latest wheeze;
'@fingr' - what is it? It's an equivalent to the old 'finger' implementation for UNIX - the twist is, is that it works on top of Twitter, as opposed to from the command line.
It is very easy to use - just go to http://twitter.com/fingr and click 'follow'
then, to set your status, send a Twitter DM to fingr - i.e.
d fingr 'today i will be visiting clients but will be back at my desk by 15:00 - SMS me on KLONDIKE 5-3226 if u need me urgently'
To check someone else's status, send a Twitter DM to fingr - i.e.
d fingr @someuserorother
- you will then receive a direct message back from @fingr with @someuserorother's status back!
Easy! :-)
See http://fingr.info for a little more info.
I have some other features coming over the next week-or-so - watch this space!
[rewind]
'@fingr' - what is it? It's an equivalent to the old 'finger' implementation for UNIX - the twist is, is that it works on top of Twitter, as opposed to from the command line.
It is very easy to use - just go to http://twitter.com/fingr and click 'follow'
then, to set your status, send a Twitter DM to fingr - i.e.
d fingr 'today i will be visiting clients but will be back at my desk by 15:00 - SMS me on KLONDIKE 5-3226 if u need me urgently'
To check someone else's status, send a Twitter DM to fingr - i.e.
d fingr @someuserorother
- you will then receive a direct message back from @fingr with @someuserorother's status back!
Easy! :-)
See http://fingr.info for a little more info.
I have some other features coming over the next week-or-so - watch this space!
[rewind]
Saturday 2 February 2008
The Hut On Hen's Legs - Baba Yaga
Have you ever heard the piece of music called "The Hut On Hen's Legs"? (Also known as 'Baba Yaga' or 'The Hut on Fowl's Legs') - It is a very famous piece of music from Mussorgsky's "Pictures at an exhibition". It is a wonderful piece of very dramatic classical music, and was even included on "Classical Thunder" - a compilation album of stirring classical music.
It is also the theme music for my all-time favourite TV series. This series was made by the BBC (obviously), back in 1977. The series is called "The Secret War".
"The Secret War" is all about the aspects of the Second World War which weren't commonly known by the general public at the time. (Hence the title, obviously).
The series covers how very difficult problems were solved (and in some cases not solved!), not by soldiers on either side of the battle, but by scientists and engineers. One episode covers the invention, and development of RADAR, and the counter-measures taken by either side to regain the upper hand.
There is a common thread that runs through the series, and it is this; someone comes up with a new idea, totally out of left-field, which has the potential to change the way that war is fought, and may even help to win the war, and how the establishment cannot grasp this new development, and does not want to risk time and money developing this new idea, because the people responsible for signing it off have no idea what the development really means.
Does this sound familiar? The reason this series is my favourite, is because it contains interviews with the people who either came up with, or developed, or actually used in anger, each of the new breakthroughs that are covered in each programme.
One episode is entitled 'The Battle Of The Beams', and it covers how scientists in Germany had adapted an existing technology ('Blind Approach Landing', used to guide aircraft pilots safely to the runway at night or in poor weather conditions), and turned it into a mechanism for guiding bombers to their targets. This initial system was called "Knickebein" (literally 'Crooked Leg' in german and also the name of a magic raven from a german fairy story). Professor R.V. Jones of Air Ministry Scientific Intelligence then relates his story of how he discovered the existence of Knickebein, and how he and a team of scientists came up with a series of counter-measures to render the Knickebein technology useless. The german scientists then went on to develop other systems ('X-Gerate' and 'Y-Gerate' (aka 'WOTAN') to regain their advantage, and again, how R.V. Jones and went on to neutralize these systems too.
The thing about the series that is most fascinating, is that 'The Secret War' was fought on many fronts (not geographical ones, but scientific/engineering ones) all at the same time - and it has provided my with a huge insight into commerce (or maybe you call it 'business'?) - A General ('Company Director') who fights a new war ('selling a product or service') without appreciating how the battlefield ('marketplace') has changed since the last battle ('signed contract was received'), is at an immediate disadvantage if the enemy general ('competing company director') has a new, secret weapon ('new product or service'), that the General does not know even exists!
The flip side of this is where an engineer proposes a new weapons-system ('new product or service') to his commanding officers (company management), which is turned down flat, because it is ;
1. too expensive
2. too difficult to understand
3. means admitting that the existing weapons ('products and services') are now obsolete
4. no perceived use for it on the battlefield ('no market for it')
To fight a war, you need;
people
money
fuel
food
communications
courage
weapons
To compete in the marketplace you need;
people
money ('fuel' and 'food')
communications
courage
products and services ('weapons')
Not a *huge* amount of difference between the two above lists, is there, really? (Okay, in war, people are killed, on both sides - in commerce, people lose their jobs on both sides)
Are *your* competitors developing "RADAR" or a "Knickebein"? Are *you* developing "RADAR" or a "Knickebein"? - if the answers to those two questions are "Don't know" and "No", then you are probably going to lose the battle, and possibly the war!
Yes, it's hard taking the decision to spend money and effort on new products and services - and hoping your competitors aren't taking risks either is a BIG gamble - watch the series for yourself, and you can see just what happens if you dither or if you to choose to put in maximum effort and take the gamble! :)
[rewind]
P.S. This is blog entry is not a glorification of war, and does not condone war, but is purely intended to get a point across. And also to rave about just how good programmes made by the BBC are, even 30 years after they are made :)
It is also the theme music for my all-time favourite TV series. This series was made by the BBC (obviously), back in 1977. The series is called "The Secret War".
"The Secret War" is all about the aspects of the Second World War which weren't commonly known by the general public at the time. (Hence the title, obviously).
The series covers how very difficult problems were solved (and in some cases not solved!), not by soldiers on either side of the battle, but by scientists and engineers. One episode covers the invention, and development of RADAR, and the counter-measures taken by either side to regain the upper hand.
There is a common thread that runs through the series, and it is this; someone comes up with a new idea, totally out of left-field, which has the potential to change the way that war is fought, and may even help to win the war, and how the establishment cannot grasp this new development, and does not want to risk time and money developing this new idea, because the people responsible for signing it off have no idea what the development really means.
Does this sound familiar? The reason this series is my favourite, is because it contains interviews with the people who either came up with, or developed, or actually used in anger, each of the new breakthroughs that are covered in each programme.
One episode is entitled 'The Battle Of The Beams', and it covers how scientists in Germany had adapted an existing technology ('Blind Approach Landing', used to guide aircraft pilots safely to the runway at night or in poor weather conditions), and turned it into a mechanism for guiding bombers to their targets. This initial system was called "Knickebein" (literally 'Crooked Leg' in german and also the name of a magic raven from a german fairy story). Professor R.V. Jones of Air Ministry Scientific Intelligence then relates his story of how he discovered the existence of Knickebein, and how he and a team of scientists came up with a series of counter-measures to render the Knickebein technology useless. The german scientists then went on to develop other systems ('X-Gerate' and 'Y-Gerate' (aka 'WOTAN') to regain their advantage, and again, how R.V. Jones and went on to neutralize these systems too.
The thing about the series that is most fascinating, is that 'The Secret War' was fought on many fronts (not geographical ones, but scientific/engineering ones) all at the same time - and it has provided my with a huge insight into commerce (or maybe you call it 'business'?) - A General ('Company Director') who fights a new war ('selling a product or service') without appreciating how the battlefield ('marketplace') has changed since the last battle ('signed contract was received'), is at an immediate disadvantage if the enemy general ('competing company director') has a new, secret weapon ('new product or service'), that the General does not know even exists!
The flip side of this is where an engineer proposes a new weapons-system ('new product or service') to his commanding officers (company management), which is turned down flat, because it is ;
1. too expensive
2. too difficult to understand
3. means admitting that the existing weapons ('products and services') are now obsolete
4. no perceived use for it on the battlefield ('no market for it')
To fight a war, you need;
people
money
fuel
food
communications
courage
weapons
To compete in the marketplace you need;
people
money ('fuel' and 'food')
communications
courage
products and services ('weapons')
Not a *huge* amount of difference between the two above lists, is there, really? (Okay, in war, people are killed, on both sides - in commerce, people lose their jobs on both sides)
Are *your* competitors developing "RADAR" or a "Knickebein"? Are *you* developing "RADAR" or a "Knickebein"? - if the answers to those two questions are "Don't know" and "No", then you are probably going to lose the battle, and possibly the war!
Yes, it's hard taking the decision to spend money and effort on new products and services - and hoping your competitors aren't taking risks either is a BIG gamble - watch the series for yourself, and you can see just what happens if you dither or if you to choose to put in maximum effort and take the gamble! :)
[rewind]
P.S. This is blog entry is not a glorification of war, and does not condone war, but is purely intended to get a point across. And also to rave about just how good programmes made by the BBC are, even 30 years after they are made :)
Friday 25 January 2008
What is this tape-monkey of which you speak?
From "http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Tape+monkey" ;
"1. Tape monkey
Someone who works in IT operations whose primary role is starting and stopping backups.
"What the F*ck would you know??? you're only a Tape Monkey!!!!"
(grammatical errors corrected by yours truly)
The thing about tape monkeys (particularly old ones like me) is we tend to see things from the bottom-up, as opposed to the top-down. For me, being a tape monkey was a bit like serving an apprenticeship with an arch-mage. Sure, you're only allowed to sweep all the dead rats into a pile before they are hurled into the cauldron where they are mixed with the odd soupcon of mouse-wee, jellied eels, lutfisk, and punched-card chads by the Guv'nor, before he blows his eyebrows off because he forgot to put in a teaspoonful of minced earwax at the critical moment, but you are there to watch and learn.
The best bit about being a tape monkey is that you get to *meet*, *work*, and *learn* from the arch-mages. For me, being a tape monkey was one of the most lucky breaks I've ever had. And yes, I really did mount 800 BPI 7-track tapes onto vacuum-tensioned drives on an antiquated ICL 2903 as part of my initiation into the IT industry (in 1983 to be exact).
Starting at the very bottom in the industry gives you a wonderfully uncluttered view of what's going on. Decollating, trimming, and bursting a box of 4-part on a machine designed by a deranged Torquemada is an experience that fires your motivation. 'There's got to be a better way to earn a living! - I wanna go and work in the programming office - those guys over there don't have to get covered in carbon black all day' was probably my mantra for the first couple of months ...
Boy, do you have to try hard to get to that point tho'!
One day, I was allowed to actually operate the mainframe console - I could actually sit at the KEYBOARD!! Wow! It was like being at Mission Control in Houston - The mainframe filled the whole room, and the keyboard and monitor were actually *bolted* to the desk which formed part of the machine - I was on my way!
[fast-forward thru apprentice operator phase]
Eventually, The tape monkey progresses to the point of trainee junior mage on probation,and is allowed to learn and practice some of the craft, and a new tape monkey joins the school and starts on rat-sweeping duty in his place. How *intoxicating* is that first taste of power, that first tussle with the compiler, how humiliating to see 'too many errors, run aborted' displayed on the screen! But, it doesn't matter - you have been given a real Fisher-Price junior mages cloak, but, it's a *cloak* - and it's all that matters :)
I remember the day I became a 'trainee junior programmer' in the computer bureau where I started - the 'Chief Programmer' (yes, there was such a role in those days) came over to me and said "Welcome to the fold" - was I proud or what? (Thanks Eddie, I've *never* forgotten it!) - He was, at that time, the company's senior wizard, and had never even noticed me when I was a humble tape monkey, but on the day I was selected to learn the craft, he was there to learn from, he acknowledged me, and I had managed to join the outer-circle. Result!
As the years rolled by, I watched people blow their eyebrows off on numerous occasions, and managed to blow my own nose, eyebrows, ears, toes, and goodness knows what else off myself into the bargain - but I learned from their mistakes, and from my own. I guess at the end of the day, that's what really counts - screwing up, blowing your own leg off, having to stand up and say 'Er, sorry guys, yep, it was me that put the toe of aardvark in *before* the Algolian sun-tigers tooth had dissolved, not *after* it had dissolved' that you really, truly learn anything.
(Disclaimer: I am not a mage, even now, after all the years of blowing myself and other things up - There are so many super-arch-mages out there, I wouldn't even *dream* of applying such a label to myself - if anything, I feel that becoming a real true mage is still a distant dream - the more I study, and the more I learn, the more I realise just how much I am still a mere trainee junior wizard wearing my now somewhat tattered and dishevelled Fisher-Price junior play-wizards outfit)
However, I've seen some things that I didn't agree with, and when you can see a real, fully qualified wizard about to blow his own head off, you can't help but pipe up and say "But Sir! You can't put a Flanian pobble bead into the mixture now - You know what the third tome says" - and they say "Hush underling, you have no right to question my authority! I carry the staff of power and wisdom - You know nothing of such matters", only to see them blow their own earlobes off and destroy the stand, the retort, and the entire lab, in the process ... - It does start to make you wonder!
Yes, of course, there is always the choice - work for a mage who already has his own lab, a big pile of rats, and a mountain of pobble beads, ratchet screwdrivers, and earwax funded by venture mages - or stick your own neck out and go and build your own lab somewhere - the problem with the latter is that all of a sudden, you stop learning, and you stop watching other neophytes blowing limbs off - neither of which is easy!
Of course - there is a *third* way, and it's one that I don't think people have really cottoned on to yet (at least in the mainstream anyway) - and yes, it's 'collaboration' and 'sharing' - I'm not ashamed to learn from other people, and I try really hard to help out and inspire others. I think there is a new form of commerce waiting in the wings, and I'm going to call it "collaborative commerce" - and the real essence of it is sharing information - there is a great big networked cauldron out there, which we can all chuck dead rats and minced earwax into, and it's called Twitter - I know I keep banging on about it, but it is really like taking your tatty Fisher-Price Junior Play-Mage's Cloak off and starting again from scratch - there are a whole new set of wizards, witches, and assorted gremlins, trolls, and what-have-you in the big, global lab that we call Cyberspace, and it helps you put it all back in perspective. The mages and wizards that you used to revere may pale in to insignificance when you are allowed to start learning again from a whole new set of teachers.
Go on, go and set up an account at http://twitter.com and spend 30 mins looking into different wizards labs - you may be very pleasantly surprised! - And if you don't meet a mage straight away, you might bump into some other apprentices who share your interests, dreams, and motivations ....
[rewind]
"1. Tape monkey
Someone who works in IT operations whose primary role is starting and stopping backups.
"What the F*ck would you know??? you're only a Tape Monkey!!!!"
(grammatical errors corrected by yours truly)
The thing about tape monkeys (particularly old ones like me) is we tend to see things from the bottom-up, as opposed to the top-down. For me, being a tape monkey was a bit like serving an apprenticeship with an arch-mage. Sure, you're only allowed to sweep all the dead rats into a pile before they are hurled into the cauldron where they are mixed with the odd soupcon of mouse-wee, jellied eels, lutfisk, and punched-card chads by the Guv'nor, before he blows his eyebrows off because he forgot to put in a teaspoonful of minced earwax at the critical moment, but you are there to watch and learn.
The best bit about being a tape monkey is that you get to *meet*, *work*, and *learn* from the arch-mages. For me, being a tape monkey was one of the most lucky breaks I've ever had. And yes, I really did mount 800 BPI 7-track tapes onto vacuum-tensioned drives on an antiquated ICL 2903 as part of my initiation into the IT industry (in 1983 to be exact).
Starting at the very bottom in the industry gives you a wonderfully uncluttered view of what's going on. Decollating, trimming, and bursting a box of 4-part on a machine designed by a deranged Torquemada is an experience that fires your motivation. 'There's got to be a better way to earn a living! - I wanna go and work in the programming office - those guys over there don't have to get covered in carbon black all day' was probably my mantra for the first couple of months ...
Boy, do you have to try hard to get to that point tho'!
One day, I was allowed to actually operate the mainframe console - I could actually sit at the KEYBOARD!! Wow! It was like being at Mission Control in Houston - The mainframe filled the whole room, and the keyboard and monitor were actually *bolted* to the desk which formed part of the machine - I was on my way!
[fast-forward thru apprentice operator phase]
Eventually, The tape monkey progresses to the point of trainee junior mage on probation,and is allowed to learn and practice some of the craft, and a new tape monkey joins the school and starts on rat-sweeping duty in his place. How *intoxicating* is that first taste of power, that first tussle with the compiler, how humiliating to see 'too many errors, run aborted' displayed on the screen! But, it doesn't matter - you have been given a real Fisher-Price junior mages cloak, but, it's a *cloak* - and it's all that matters :)
I remember the day I became a 'trainee junior programmer' in the computer bureau where I started - the 'Chief Programmer' (yes, there was such a role in those days) came over to me and said "Welcome to the fold" - was I proud or what? (Thanks Eddie, I've *never* forgotten it!) - He was, at that time, the company's senior wizard, and had never even noticed me when I was a humble tape monkey, but on the day I was selected to learn the craft, he was there to learn from, he acknowledged me, and I had managed to join the outer-circle. Result!
As the years rolled by, I watched people blow their eyebrows off on numerous occasions, and managed to blow my own nose, eyebrows, ears, toes, and goodness knows what else off myself into the bargain - but I learned from their mistakes, and from my own. I guess at the end of the day, that's what really counts - screwing up, blowing your own leg off, having to stand up and say 'Er, sorry guys, yep, it was me that put the toe of aardvark in *before* the Algolian sun-tigers tooth had dissolved, not *after* it had dissolved' that you really, truly learn anything.
(Disclaimer: I am not a mage, even now, after all the years of blowing myself and other things up - There are so many super-arch-mages out there, I wouldn't even *dream* of applying such a label to myself - if anything, I feel that becoming a real true mage is still a distant dream - the more I study, and the more I learn, the more I realise just how much I am still a mere trainee junior wizard wearing my now somewhat tattered and dishevelled Fisher-Price junior play-wizards outfit)
However, I've seen some things that I didn't agree with, and when you can see a real, fully qualified wizard about to blow his own head off, you can't help but pipe up and say "But Sir! You can't put a Flanian pobble bead into the mixture now - You know what the third tome says" - and they say "Hush underling, you have no right to question my authority! I carry the staff of power and wisdom - You know nothing of such matters", only to see them blow their own earlobes off and destroy the stand, the retort, and the entire lab, in the process ... - It does start to make you wonder!
Yes, of course, there is always the choice - work for a mage who already has his own lab, a big pile of rats, and a mountain of pobble beads, ratchet screwdrivers, and earwax funded by venture mages - or stick your own neck out and go and build your own lab somewhere - the problem with the latter is that all of a sudden, you stop learning, and you stop watching other neophytes blowing limbs off - neither of which is easy!
Of course - there is a *third* way, and it's one that I don't think people have really cottoned on to yet (at least in the mainstream anyway) - and yes, it's 'collaboration' and 'sharing' - I'm not ashamed to learn from other people, and I try really hard to help out and inspire others. I think there is a new form of commerce waiting in the wings, and I'm going to call it "collaborative commerce" - and the real essence of it is sharing information - there is a great big networked cauldron out there, which we can all chuck dead rats and minced earwax into, and it's called Twitter - I know I keep banging on about it, but it is really like taking your tatty Fisher-Price Junior Play-Mage's Cloak off and starting again from scratch - there are a whole new set of wizards, witches, and assorted gremlins, trolls, and what-have-you in the big, global lab that we call Cyberspace, and it helps you put it all back in perspective. The mages and wizards that you used to revere may pale in to insignificance when you are allowed to start learning again from a whole new set of teachers.
Go on, go and set up an account at http://twitter.com and spend 30 mins looking into different wizards labs - you may be very pleasantly surprised! - And if you don't meet a mage straight away, you might bump into some other apprentices who share your interests, dreams, and motivations ....
[rewind]
Sunday 6 January 2008
Oops! I wasn't expecting that! *giggle*
Well, I sneaked the URL for the memeGator onto a networking site on Friday, asking people for a bit of feedback about it - Then I took the bow-wows for a walk ....
Two hours later, I thought "let's see what the Gator is displaying at the moment" and went to the homepage for it (http://memeGator.com) - so I fired up the browser and went to its homepage ...
After 60 seconds or so without a page being displayed, I thought "that's strange - why isn't it showing anything?" - it wasn't my PC or my broadband connection that was on the fritz, so I logged into the server directly ...
4 minutes later I finally got a "login:" prompt - when the shell came up, I did a quick 'uptime' to find out how busy the server was - it had a load average of 125.45!!! (the load average before I posted the link was about 0.01!)
Needless to say, the whole machine had been *SWAMPED* with hits - I shutdown apache and removed the memegator site and replaced it with a holding page.
So, it appears that ;
1. People saw the link I posted
2. People visited the link I posted
3. The kit I've got to run it on is *hopelessly* underpowered for the job
4. I've got a *really* nice problem to solve :D
[FX: Looks at credit card balance and realises can't fund acquisition of half-a-dozen brand new Dell PowerEdges on tick at the moment]
[FX: Reaches for business card file]
The Gator will be with you again shortly tho, never fear ....
tape-monkey
[rewind]
Two hours later, I thought "let's see what the Gator is displaying at the moment" and went to the homepage for it (http://memeGator.com) - so I fired up the browser and went to its homepage ...
After 60 seconds or so without a page being displayed, I thought "that's strange - why isn't it showing anything?" - it wasn't my PC or my broadband connection that was on the fritz, so I logged into the server directly ...
4 minutes later I finally got a "login:" prompt - when the shell came up, I did a quick 'uptime' to find out how busy the server was - it had a load average of 125.45!!! (the load average before I posted the link was about 0.01!)
Needless to say, the whole machine had been *SWAMPED* with hits - I shutdown apache and removed the memegator site and replaced it with a holding page.
So, it appears that ;
1. People saw the link I posted
2. People visited the link I posted
3. The kit I've got to run it on is *hopelessly* underpowered for the job
4. I've got a *really* nice problem to solve :D
[FX: Looks at credit card balance and realises can't fund acquisition of half-a-dozen brand new Dell PowerEdges on tick at the moment]
[FX: Reaches for business card file]
The Gator will be with you again shortly tho, never fear ....
tape-monkey
[rewind]
Tuesday 13 November 2007
Where *is* my flying car ?
Today, I came across the term which describes the style of art I have been unknowingly been obsessed with all my life, and it's called 'Googie' or 'Populuxe', or 'Raygun Gothic' (it depends on who you are talking to which decides which is the correct term).
I grew up watching 'Thunderbirds', 'Captain Scarlet','Forbidden Planet','Battle Beneath The Earth', and so on - all visions of the future as perceived by the people who came to adulthood during the 30s,40s,and 50s. These people created a 'future', or a vision of the 'future', in architecture, art, and design. (Think of the 'Seattle Space Needle',the Plymouth Fury Sport Coupe, and so on). A world of flying cars, jet packs, and hypersonic planes that could fly from New York to Tokyo in 2 hours or less).
What happened to that optimism, that excitement, that 'can-do' attitude ? Where *is* my jet pack ? Where *is* my flying car?
I face a future of global warming, an energy crisis, global terrorism, busted pension funds, and an almost guaranteed dystopic future - and what I want to know is, why ?
Today, 'fins and chrome', 'perspex', 'jet packs', and so on are perceived as some sort of naiive joke, a childish view of the 'future'.
The people of the late fifties and early sixties were galvanized by JFK's pledge to put a man on the moon, and return him safely to Earth. 25 billion dollars it cost - and at that time, 25 billion dollars was a lot of money. The UK is going to spend the same amount of money on building a sports centre to hold the Olympic Games in 2012.
Have I missed something?
When JFK pledged to put a man on the moon, 25 billion dollars was a *lot* of money. Today, it's the amount of money you can con the tax payer out of for a two week sporting event.
I don't know what the modern value of JFK's investment is, but I guess it's around 200 billion dollars (and that's just a guess).
What could we do with a 200 billion dollar investment today? I think JFK (had he lived) would have been overjoyed with his investment. When man first went in to space, the transistor wasn't even a dream. By the time the Apollo programme was cancelled, Intel had manufactured the worlds first microprocessor, and Intel chips are at the heart of all modern commerce. I would go as far as to say that the x86 is the hot rivet of the 21st century - millions of them are hammered into things every year, and they hold the steel plates of the information economy together.
What happened to that pioneering spirit? Where is the Apollo programme that I can buy into ? What is that next great step that mankind will make that I will be happy to sit up all night in front of the TV (ok, 3g cell phone) to see history being made?
Bush has pledged to take Man back to the moon, and on to Mars. Rather a hollow promise I think? NASA can't even bring the Space Shuttle from earth orbit back safely, let alone redevelop (because all the original scientists/engineers/etc are dead/retired/etc) a rocket that can take man back to the moon.
Have we, as a species, so completely sold out? Have we given up pushing the boundaries of what makes us different from mice, monkeys and the rest?
The Internet, a spin-off from the Cold War, is a medium so incredibly powerful, a global water-cooler for the exchange of ideas, dreams, and ambitions, is primarily a means of moving pornography from one side of the world to another. And who is complaining? Nobody. With the Internet at our beck and call, it is used for the most trivial of purposes, for porn, cheap phone calls, and advertising. Well, woo-hoo. The iPod and the iPhone. big deal. a tethered device engineered to extract dollars for back catalogue music from the dying record labels. PVRs and satellite TV - more tethered technologies to sell back catalogue TV episodes and adverts to the masses.
Is that it ? Have we reached our inspirational peak ? Is pay-per-click, or pay-per-stream, or 'acceptable exit strategy' the summit of man's achievements?
Well, I don't know about you, dear reader, but I think there's more to be done - there is more we can achieve other than shipping nudey flicks around the globe, or to stuffing adverts in RSS feeds - and I don't care about the resolution of the images or the relevance of the ads!
There is a man, who is as close to Isambard Kingdom Brunel as we are likely to get in our era, and his name is Burt Rutan. His company, Scaled Composites, won the Ansari X-Prize for putting a man into orbit on a shoe string budget. What could Mr. Rutan achieve with 25 billion dollars in investment behind him? Who knows?
Well, I'm not going to stop dreaming, thinking, or caring - but I'm just the little guy, the end product of a society that couldn't grasp the motivations and drive of JFK, or if they could, they just worked out how they could exploit it for their own petty personal ambitions - and for that I'm paying £1 for a litre of petrol for a car that still can't fly ...
[rewind]
I grew up watching 'Thunderbirds', 'Captain Scarlet','Forbidden Planet','Battle Beneath The Earth', and so on - all visions of the future as perceived by the people who came to adulthood during the 30s,40s,and 50s. These people created a 'future', or a vision of the 'future', in architecture, art, and design. (Think of the 'Seattle Space Needle',the Plymouth Fury Sport Coupe, and so on). A world of flying cars, jet packs, and hypersonic planes that could fly from New York to Tokyo in 2 hours or less).
What happened to that optimism, that excitement, that 'can-do' attitude ? Where *is* my jet pack ? Where *is* my flying car?
I face a future of global warming, an energy crisis, global terrorism, busted pension funds, and an almost guaranteed dystopic future - and what I want to know is, why ?
Today, 'fins and chrome', 'perspex', 'jet packs', and so on are perceived as some sort of naiive joke, a childish view of the 'future'.
The people of the late fifties and early sixties were galvanized by JFK's pledge to put a man on the moon, and return him safely to Earth. 25 billion dollars it cost - and at that time, 25 billion dollars was a lot of money. The UK is going to spend the same amount of money on building a sports centre to hold the Olympic Games in 2012.
Have I missed something?
When JFK pledged to put a man on the moon, 25 billion dollars was a *lot* of money. Today, it's the amount of money you can con the tax payer out of for a two week sporting event.
I don't know what the modern value of JFK's investment is, but I guess it's around 200 billion dollars (and that's just a guess).
What could we do with a 200 billion dollar investment today? I think JFK (had he lived) would have been overjoyed with his investment. When man first went in to space, the transistor wasn't even a dream. By the time the Apollo programme was cancelled, Intel had manufactured the worlds first microprocessor, and Intel chips are at the heart of all modern commerce. I would go as far as to say that the x86 is the hot rivet of the 21st century - millions of them are hammered into things every year, and they hold the steel plates of the information economy together.
What happened to that pioneering spirit? Where is the Apollo programme that I can buy into ? What is that next great step that mankind will make that I will be happy to sit up all night in front of the TV (ok, 3g cell phone) to see history being made?
Bush has pledged to take Man back to the moon, and on to Mars. Rather a hollow promise I think? NASA can't even bring the Space Shuttle from earth orbit back safely, let alone redevelop (because all the original scientists/engineers/etc are dead/retired/etc) a rocket that can take man back to the moon.
Have we, as a species, so completely sold out? Have we given up pushing the boundaries of what makes us different from mice, monkeys and the rest?
The Internet, a spin-off from the Cold War, is a medium so incredibly powerful, a global water-cooler for the exchange of ideas, dreams, and ambitions, is primarily a means of moving pornography from one side of the world to another. And who is complaining? Nobody. With the Internet at our beck and call, it is used for the most trivial of purposes, for porn, cheap phone calls, and advertising. Well, woo-hoo. The iPod and the iPhone. big deal. a tethered device engineered to extract dollars for back catalogue music from the dying record labels. PVRs and satellite TV - more tethered technologies to sell back catalogue TV episodes and adverts to the masses.
Is that it ? Have we reached our inspirational peak ? Is pay-per-click, or pay-per-stream, or 'acceptable exit strategy' the summit of man's achievements?
Well, I don't know about you, dear reader, but I think there's more to be done - there is more we can achieve other than shipping nudey flicks around the globe, or to stuffing adverts in RSS feeds - and I don't care about the resolution of the images or the relevance of the ads!
There is a man, who is as close to Isambard Kingdom Brunel as we are likely to get in our era, and his name is Burt Rutan. His company, Scaled Composites, won the Ansari X-Prize for putting a man into orbit on a shoe string budget. What could Mr. Rutan achieve with 25 billion dollars in investment behind him? Who knows?
Well, I'm not going to stop dreaming, thinking, or caring - but I'm just the little guy, the end product of a society that couldn't grasp the motivations and drive of JFK, or if they could, they just worked out how they could exploit it for their own petty personal ambitions - and for that I'm paying £1 for a litre of petrol for a car that still can't fly ...
[rewind]
Thursday 24 May 2007
hmm. this "blogging" stuff ...
(Before you start, I couldn't make this entry 140 characters or less!)
I read a lot of online content - from all the big names, doggdot, Gigaom, Techcrunch, El Reg, and so on. I've just been doing a bit of surfing based on some names that fell out of one of the big sites, so I tracked down the applicable personal site and had a look at it.
It appears that the site I visited was another "bloggers co-op" where some obviously savvy people had decided to pool their efforts. Maybe I caught them on a bad day, but to be honest, i wasn't very impressed. (hey, this is only my second entry myself, so maybe i should quit gobbing off at this point, but i will press on regardless).
I think the main problem with "blogging" (what a horrendous name for a technology that is), is that to make someone read an entry, the title has to have a good "hook" - it is the first thing that catches the readers interest. It also seems to contain 97% of the relevent information.
For example: "Company X is going to buy Company Y for PQ squillion dollars"
Ok, so far, so good. I click on the above title, and then i'm presented with 'n' paragraphs of waffle
on why it's/not a good idea in the author's (or his mate down the pub/in a hedge fund) opinion.
Now "Twitter" (http://twitter.com) , I really like. It restricts you to 140 characters, so you can't waffle with it (well you could try I suppose, but you won't get very far).
However, you *can* get an awful lot of useful information into 140 characters. (or, you can list the contents of your sandwich box and thermos flask in 140 characters too, probably - and people do do things like that on twitter)
Personally, I don't have hours on end to spend wade through huge personal tomes (like this entry i'm bashing in now *blush*), and to be brutally frank, I don't *really* care what the "bloggers" opinion actually is, but the *facts* that they are reporting (usually in the title) interest me a *lot*, and the blogger who reports the most facts the most speedily is definitely going to get me "throwing up the horns" in reverence when I hear her/his name being mentioned.
Anyway according to this blog entry I read, Google (alledgedly) are allegedly buying Feedburner (allegedly) (insert all necessary legal disclaimers at this point) for a lot of money (alledgedly). That's all I need to know. I know what feedburner does and I know what google does. I don't really need read someones prediction that "maybe they will start stuffing adverts into rss feeds" - Because in this case it's patently obvious!
For example: Chocolate manufacturer buys major Biscuit baking company - "the author suspects that maybe this will pave the way for a new line in chocolate-covered biscuits?" Well, "Stap me vitals!" I say - I'd never've worked that out without the "bloggers" acute insight.
Maybe I'm being a bit harsh, but the people who break this sort of news "company x buying company y" etc are obviously brainier, better-connected people than me - however I'm not a *complete* moron, and the prediction of "revolutionary 'chocolate covered biscuits' or other chocolate/baked confection hybrid technology that we've yet to imagine being just around the corner" are pointless and devalue the posting.(Why not just say, "see subject line" ? - all the *useful* content is in it after all)
The point for this prolonged rant ? Well, I'm just back from my holidays, and have had to read my backlog (AKA "catch-up" - another hackneyed over-used management-cliche that belongs to the check shirt, cuff-links, but no tie wearing brigade - Yes, you know who you are ;) of email and favourite tech site content. maybe next time i should settle with just reading the email subject lines and the raw xml from the RSS feeds, then I wouldn't work myself up into such a froth.
Bright Blessings to you and yours ...
tape-monkey
I read a lot of online content - from all the big names, doggdot, Gigaom, Techcrunch, El Reg, and so on. I've just been doing a bit of surfing based on some names that fell out of one of the big sites, so I tracked down the applicable personal site and had a look at it.
It appears that the site I visited was another "bloggers co-op" where some obviously savvy people had decided to pool their efforts. Maybe I caught them on a bad day, but to be honest, i wasn't very impressed. (hey, this is only my second entry myself, so maybe i should quit gobbing off at this point, but i will press on regardless).
I think the main problem with "blogging" (what a horrendous name for a technology that is), is that to make someone read an entry, the title has to have a good "hook" - it is the first thing that catches the readers interest. It also seems to contain 97% of the relevent information.
For example: "Company X is going to buy Company Y for PQ squillion dollars"
Ok, so far, so good. I click on the above title, and then i'm presented with 'n' paragraphs of waffle
on why it's/not a good idea in the author's (or his mate down the pub/in a hedge fund) opinion.
Now "Twitter" (http://twitter.com) , I really like. It restricts you to 140 characters, so you can't waffle with it (well you could try I suppose, but you won't get very far).
However, you *can* get an awful lot of useful information into 140 characters. (or, you can list the contents of your sandwich box and thermos flask in 140 characters too, probably - and people do do things like that on twitter)
Personally, I don't have hours on end to spend wade through huge personal tomes (like this entry i'm bashing in now *blush*), and to be brutally frank, I don't *really* care what the "bloggers" opinion actually is, but the *facts* that they are reporting (usually in the title) interest me a *lot*, and the blogger who reports the most facts the most speedily is definitely going to get me "throwing up the horns" in reverence when I hear her/his name being mentioned.
Anyway according to this blog entry I read, Google (alledgedly) are allegedly buying Feedburner (allegedly) (insert all necessary legal disclaimers at this point) for a lot of money (alledgedly). That's all I need to know. I know what feedburner does and I know what google does. I don't really need read someones prediction that "maybe they will start stuffing adverts into rss feeds" - Because in this case it's patently obvious!
For example: Chocolate manufacturer buys major Biscuit baking company - "the author suspects that maybe this will pave the way for a new line in chocolate-covered biscuits?" Well, "Stap me vitals!" I say - I'd never've worked that out without the "bloggers" acute insight.
Maybe I'm being a bit harsh, but the people who break this sort of news "company x buying company y" etc are obviously brainier, better-connected people than me - however I'm not a *complete* moron, and the prediction of "revolutionary 'chocolate covered biscuits' or other chocolate/baked confection hybrid technology that we've yet to imagine being just around the corner" are pointless and devalue the posting.(Why not just say, "see subject line" ? - all the *useful* content is in it after all)
The point for this prolonged rant ? Well, I'm just back from my holidays, and have had to read my backlog (AKA "catch-up" - another hackneyed over-used management-cliche that belongs to the check shirt, cuff-links, but no tie wearing brigade - Yes, you know who you are ;) of email and favourite tech site content. maybe next time i should settle with just reading the email subject lines and the raw xml from the RSS feeds, then I wouldn't work myself up into such a froth.
Bright Blessings to you and yours ...
tape-monkey
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)